rubric Name: Assignment 1: Collective Bargaining Analysis (Paper)
Print Rubric
Criteria
Outstanding
50 points
Proficient
40 points
Basic
30 points
Below Expectations
20 points
Not Present
0 points
Criterion Score
Addresses nature of the collective bargaining dispute and the underlying causes of the dispute. Discusses the environment, trends, influences, challenges, current trends
Effectively addresses the nature of the collective bargaining dispute and the underlying causes of the dispute.
Discusses the environment, trends, influences, challenges, current trends.
Addresses the nature of the collective bargaining dispute and the underlying causes of the dispute although not as comprehensively as it should be.
Discusses the environment, trends, influences, challenges, current trends; makes some indistinct or incomplete connections regarding relevance and workplace connections.
Identifies some of the key issues of the nature of the collective bargaining dispute and some of the underlying causes of the dispute.
Some elements of the article are missing or inappropriately identified.
Doesn’t identify at least the nature of the collective bargaining dispute and the underlying causes of the dispute.
The topic is loosely connected; linkages not made; fails to identify relevance.
Did not submit or did not meet minimum expectations.
Score of Addresses nature of the collective bargaining dispute and the underlying causes of the dispute. Discusses the environment, trends, influences, challenges, current trends,
/ 50
Identifies the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute
Identifies the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute. Makes strong, logical connections.
Identifies some the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute. Makes some logical connections.
Identifies at least some of the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute. Makes some loose connections.
Little or no identification of the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute. Makes no logical connections.
Did not submit or did not meet minimum expectations.
Score of Identifies the economic or ethical pressures each side has attempted to use to prevail in the dispute,
/ 50
What, if any, role was played by third parties in resolving this bargaining dispute? What was the identity of the third party?
Discussed the role, if any, played by third parties in resolving this dispute and identified the third party. Reader can easily follow the author’s logic and flow.
Discussed, though not comprehensively, the role, if any, played by third parties in resolving this dispute and identified the third party. While overall well-organized, at times the writing forces the reader to determine the author’s train of thought.
Discussed the role, if any, played by third parties in resolving this dispute; however, did not identify a third party. Consistent organization is lacking causing the reader to have difficulty in following the author’s train of thought.
Did not discuss the role, if any, played by third parties in resolving this dispute and didn’t discuss or identify a third party.
Paper lacks a sense of organization or plan to the presentation of ideas.
Did not submit or did not meet minimum expectations.
Score of What, if any, role was played by third parties in resolving this bargaining dispute? What was the identity of the third party?,
/ 50
Was the dispute resolved? In retrospect, could this dispute have been resolved in a more constructive fashion? If so, how?
Discussed if the dispute was resolved and if it could have been resolved in a more constructive manner. Reader can easily follow the author’s logic and flow.
Discussed, although not comprehensively, if the dispute was resolved and if it could have been resolved in a more constructive manner.
While overall well-organized, at times the writing forces the reader to determine the author’s train of thought.
Discussed if the dispute was resolved although not if it could have been resolved in a more constructive manner.
Consistent organization is lacking causing the reader to have difficulty in following the author’s train of thought.
Did not discuss if the dispute was resolved or not and didn’t suggest if it could have been resolved in a constructive manner.
Paper lacks a sense of organization or plan to the presentation of ideas.
Did not submit or did not meet minimum expectations.
Score of Was the dispute resolved? In retrospect, could this dispute have been resolved in a more constructive fashion? If so, how?,
/ 50
Use of current and relevant sources, citation and mechanics; accurate use of APA style for in-text citations and References
The author has identified and selected a minimum of three very appropriate and current resources.
The paper correctly cites in-text and lists resources on the References page. If additional sources are used, they are included correctly.
The author has identified and selected at least two sources that are appropriate for this assignment.
The majority of in-text citations and the references are properly cited; formatting is inconsistent / inaccurate in a few cases.
The author has identified and selected one source that is commercial rather than academic or from a business sources such as vendor Web sites..
References are cited but incorrectly under APA style. The student has either used another format or incorrectly applied the APA style guidelines.
The author has not identified or selected an article that is appropriate; it is commercial rather than academic or from a business sources such as vendor Web sites.
Inconsistent or missing in-text citations; fails to attribute an author’s word through APA citations.
Did not submit or did not meet minimum expectations.
Score of Use of current and relevant sources, citation and mechanics; accurate use of APA style for in-text citations and References,
/ 50
Total
Score of Assignment 1: Collective Bargaining Analysis (Paper),
/ 250
Overall Score
Outstanding
225 points minimum
Proficient
200 points minimum
Basic
175 points minimum
Below Expectations
150 points minimum
Not Present
0 points minimum
