Category: Philosophy homework help

American Indian Philosophies & Worldviews

American Indian Philosophies & Worldviews

Format: 2-3 pages, 1” margins, double-spaced, 10-12 pt font. Please do not add a cover sheet. Simply include your name, course number (AIS 320), and Essay 1 at the top of the page (either centered or adjusted left).

Also, no secondary sources are required. You need only refer to the reading assignments (and lectures, when appropriate).. For example, “William Apess brings up the issue of a disputed deed to Marshpee land, which he makes the central part of his argument to the Massachusetts General Court that the state is responsible for redressing the Marshpee’s grievance against Phineas Fish (64-65).” Furthermore, whenever making a direct quote from the book, quotations should be brief, a sentence or two at a time. Please avoid using lengthy block quotes.American Indian Philosophies & Worldviews

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Instructions:

Making references to God Is Red by Vine Deloria Jr, answer the following questions:

Vine Deloria Jr, God Is Red: A Native View of Religion (Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing, 2003)

Look at the stories that Deloria tells in chapters 1, 5 and 8 about the archeological excavation in Welch, Minnesota (p 10-11), the missionary and the Indian story of corn (p 84-85), and the supernova of the year 1054 (p 134). Taking the chapter in-which each story appears as context, what does each story teach about the differences in how western culture and civilization understands human remains and artifacts, sacred stories, and natural phenomena differently than their American Indian counterparts? In your concluding paragraph, explain what these stories teach the reader about American Indian religion and how it is different from Christianity? Remember, you are being asked to explicate ideas in God Is Red. American Indian Philosophies & Worldviews

A Dialogue between Miller and Weirob

A Dialogue between Miller and Weirob

  1. Explain how Weirob argues that Miller’s plan to base personal identity on soul identity fails. Be sure to include her argument for why soul identity judgments are not, in her opinion, reliable.
  2. Explain how Weirob criticizes the proposal that personal identity can be based on really remembering when really remembering is defined in this way: Really remembering — seeming to remember plus being identical with the person who did what is remembered.A Dialogue between Miller and Weirob
  3. When Miller proposes that our memories can be preserved in the after-life by means of a Heavenly duplicate of our earthly brains, Cohen proposes a way to avoid the possibility of branching caused by the possibility of more than one heavenly duplicate brain. Explain why it is good to avoid the problem of branching and explain what Cohen’s proposal is for avoiding that problem when Miller uses the heavenly duplicates in his argument.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

  4. Explain how Weirob criticizes Cohen’s proposal that you have discussed in question #4. Do you think Weirob’s criticism is effective? Defend your answer.
  1. Explain how Weirob argues that Miller’s plan to base personal identity on soul identity fails. Be sure to include her argument for why soul identity judgments are not, in her opinion, reliable.A Dialogue between Miller and Weirob
  2. Explain how Weirob criticizes the proposal that personal identity can be based on really remembering when really remembering is defined in this way: Really remembering — seeming to remember plus being identical with the person who did what is remembered.
  3. When Miller proposes that our memories can be preserved in the after-life by means of a Heavenly duplicate of our earthly brains, Cohen proposes a way to avoid the possibility of branching caused by the possibility of more than one heavenly duplicate brain. Explain why it is good to avoid the problem of branching and explain what Cohen’s proposal is for avoiding that problem when Miller uses the heavenly duplicates in his argument.
  4. Explain how Weirob criticizes Cohen’s proposal that you have discussed in question #4. Do you think Weirob’s criticism is effective? Defend your answer.

A Dialogue between Miller and Weirob

Ethical Theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant

Ethical Theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant

  • Paper should be 6-7 pages in length when double-spaced and using a 12 point font.
  • Include at least four sources; the textbook may be used as one of your sources.
  • Please DO NOT cite any online reference encyclopedias such as Wikipedia, Britannica, or Encarta. Your sources should consist of scholarly journal articles and books available through the Ivy Tech Virtual Library ONLY. All sources must be cited (must have an end note or a foot note) and the source included in a bibliography.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

  • The format of the citations and bibliography must be of a nationally accepted formatting system such as MLA or APA.

The paper must be based upon YOUR CHOICE of A or B:

  • A. Compare and contrast the concepts of determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each of these positions? Which one do you believe is the most likely to be correct? Why?
  • B. Compare and contrast the ethical theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant
  1. What are the strengths and weaknesses of each of these positions?
  2. Which one do you believe is the most likely to be correct? Why? The paper is worth 100 points.

Ethical Theories of Aristotle and Immanuel Kant

Descartes’ “Evil Demon” Discussion

Descartes’ “Evil Demon” Discussion

  • Answer the next TWO questions individually and equally in two full pages:
  1. Reconstruct Descartes’ “Evil Demon” argument. What is the argument supposed to accomplish? How is it related to what I have called Radical Skepticism? Is Descartes a skeptic? Do you believe that certainty is necessary for knowledge? Give at least one reason in support of your belief. ——-Descartes’ “Evil Demon” Discussion
  2. Summarize Hume’s account of how we acquire ideas about the world. What is the Copy Thesis? Consider at two objections to the copy thesis. How do we form knowledge on the basis of these ideas, according to Hume? Identify the two main kinds of knowledge and explain why Hume thinks that only one kind is genuinely informative.

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

  • Answer the next TWO questions individually and equally in two full pages:
  1. Reconstruct Descartes’ “Evil Demon” argument. What is the argument supposed to accomplish? How is it related to what I have called Radical Skepticism? Is Descartes a skeptic? Do you believe that certainty is necessary for knowledge? Give at least one reason in support of your belief. ——-
  2. Summarize Hume’s account of how we acquire ideas about the world. What is the Copy Thesis? Consider at two objections to the copy thesis. How do we form knowledge on the basis of these ideas, according to Hume? Identify the two main kinds of knowledge and explain why Hume thinks that only one kind is genuinely informative.

Descartes’ “Evil Demon” Discussion

Question on Ethical Values and Considerations

Question on Ethical Values and Considerations

  • Address the following in a three-page paper:
  1. Identify a current event or contemporary social issue that involves ethical values. Your issue must be broad enough to sustain deep philosophical analysis and must have relevance to your community. A good choice of issue is one that (1) involves a decision that must be made that involves competing ethical values and considerations, (2) includes with various available options about which reasonable people can disagree, (3) concretely affects people’s lives, and (4) might be influenced by external and internal factors such as social norms, oppression, religious and other personal beliefs, socially-imposed constraints (such as laws), and physical limitations. Issues that only affect a few people or have only a minor impact are probably too narrow. Issues that you are not open to examining with an open mind will also not work well for this assignment. For some topic suggestions, you might want to browse the website of a reputable news organization or review some political blogs you follow.
  2. Identify at least two news articles on your topic located using reputable news outlets. Make sure that the articles you choose present at least two different accounts of the values that should be considered in addressing the issue and include information and facts that you can use to develop your arguments and analysis. If you cannot locate two news articles on your topic, or if all of the articles share the same perspective, you should choose another topic. You should cite the two articles using correct APA citation.Question on Ethical Values and Considerations

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

  3. Explain at least one ethical theory from your assigned readings. Cite support from the primary text selections in the chapter as well as authoritative secondary sources such as the course text and online lectures.
  4. Analyze the issue using the theory of ethics. For example, you might discuss utilitarianism, deontology, virtue/care ethics, or existentialism.
  5. Contrast this analysis with the approach a second theory would take. For instance, you might contrast deontology with utilitarianism by distinguishing duty from the principle of utility, or compare care ethics and existentialism by discussing the relative approaches to intersubjectivity.

Question on Ethical Values and Considerations

Question on Yoga Philosophy Discussion

Question on Yoga Philosophy Discussion

  • Please choose one topic and write your essay. Your essay should be based on assigned lessons reading (from a folder lessons 1-4).
  • You may go beyond these readings and use additional reading, but you have to cite the bibliography at the end of the paper, and follow MLA or APA format from the beginning to the end. Be consistent.
  1. What is Indian philosophy? Is there Indian philosophy?
  2. The Jainist and Carvaka approach to ethics. Are they compatible?
  3. The concept of freedom in Yoga philosophy.
  4. The eight fold of yogic techniques of Yoga philosophy. What are these, and how are they related to each other?
  5. Why is knowledge, especially self-knowledge, regarded as the highest philosophical achievement?
  6. Where does Indian thought place responsibility for the human condition?Question on Yoga Philosophy Discussion

    ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

  • Please choose one topic and write your essay. Your essay should be based on assigned lessons reading (from a folder lessons 1-4).
  • You may go beyond these readings and use additional reading, but you have to cite the bibliography at the end of the paper, and follow MLA or APA format from the beginning to the end. Be consistent.
  1. What is Indian philosophy? Is there Indian philosophy?
  2. The Jainist and Carvaka approach to ethics. Are they compatible?
  3. The concept of freedom in Yoga philosophy.
  4. The eight fold of yogic techniques of Yoga philosophy. What are these, and how are they related to each other?
  5. Why is knowledge, especially self-knowledge, regarded as the highest philosophical achievement?
  6. Where does Indian thought place responsibility for the human condition?

Question on Yoga Philosophy Discussion

Philosophy 4

Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling (1843), “Ethics and Faith”

 Answer one of the following questions in 100 words based on the reading giving to you.

1.  What is “Faith” for Kierkegaard? And how does he see faith in relation to Ethics?

(Try to find examples from the text. And also, tell me in your own words).

2. What does he mean by his question: “Is there a Teleological Suspension of the Ethical?”

(In your own words, what does the question mean?)

3. Can you think of any examples of where it would be justified to “suspend the ethical,”

(to suspend a common or universal idea of ethics), for the rights or faith of an individual?

(You can mention either hypothetical, or actual examples. Really think about what this

questions asks).

4. What is the “Knight of Faith” for Kierkegaard? And how does he compare this figure

to the tragic hero, to prove his point about faith?

(Again, find examples from the text).

5. Is there a problem with Kierkegaard’s philosophy of Faith?   What does it actually mean for ethics?

(Also, think about our contemporary society today. How might Kierkegaard’s ideas fit

into today’s world?)

6. And finally, I would like you to think about your own life. How does faith play a role in

informing your ethics? Also, how does your idea of faith relate to Kierkegaard’s, if at all?

(Think broadly about the different ways that you can interpret the question.)

Graph Critique – Module 04 Written Assignment

Using your favorite search engine, perform a search for 3 different graphs that represent healthcare data.
In a 2-3 page paper, written in APA format and using proper spelling/grammar, address the following:

  1. For each graph, list the type of graph used and describe the data that is presented. Include a picture of each graph.
  2. In your critique, determine whether the data is being portrayed effectively for each graph. Is a different type of graph needed? Is the graph easy to understand?
  3. Include a discussion comparing the 3 graphs to each other.

Philosophy homework help

This assignment addresses that part of social work practice that you believe to be the most difficult for you to perform. A central part of the paper should be a candid, open examination of how your own perceptions, attitudes, values, experiences, emotions and stereotypes may influence your ability to perform this particular aspect of social work practice. Choose one of the following examples of topics to cover:
·         Resistance to engagement: open/subtle hostility from clients.
·         Cultural variance of clients and workers: race, status, political, gender identity, etc.
·         Clients who evoke images from your past: parents, siblings, peers, childhood, adolescence, etc.
·         Diverse populations: the differently-abled, members of the LGBTQIA+ community, older adults, mandated clients, women, men, children, ethnic minorities, etc.
·         Others topics you may desire to select (please discuss these with the instructor prior to doing this assignment).
 
After thoroughly defining and describing the practice aspect you select, examine the roots of your perceived difficulty. Theories and required readings discussed in the current or previous classes should be applied to the assessment.
Next, incorporate discussion on the NASW Code of Ethics, specifically the core values of social work. Which values apply to your discussion? Be specific in your application.
The final section should be a thoughtful description of the personal plan you have devised to address this perceived deficit for future practice. Please note: stating that you will simply refer a client for services elsewhere is not sufficient.
Note: You may write in the first person. It is helpful to include a personal dimension of how this problem/situation may have somehow touched your life.
Limit the body of your paper to 3-4 typewritten, double-spaced pages, using a 12-point font. You must make use of at least 2 different professional reference sources (general web pages/sites are not considered professional literature) to support your discussion, in addition to the NASW Code of Ethics. Be sure that the sources you cite are used to explore your own thoughts, ideas, and behaviors and that you are not providing information on how to treat specific individuals. Your references should be used to support your discussion about why working with this population presents an ethical dilemma for you, not to describe the population.
For example, if you anticipate that working with clients with substance use issues is an issue, cite resources that discuss topics such countertransference and boundaries. Do not include articles about the numbers of adults with substance use issues, factors that lead to substance use issues, etc.
Be sure to utilize correct APA format and proofread your writing thoroughly.

Philosophy homework help

 
This assignment addresses that part of social work practice that you believe to be the most difficult for you to perform. A central part of the paper should be a candid, open examination of how your own perceptions, attitudes, values, experiences, emotions and stereotypes may influence your ability to perform this particular aspect of social work practice. Choose one of the following examples of topics to cover:
·         Resistance to engagement: open/subtle hostility from clients.
·         Cultural variance of clients and workers: race, status, political, gender identity, etc.
·         Clients who evoke images from your past: parents, siblings, peers, childhood, adolescence, etc.
·         Diverse populations: the differently-abled, members of the LGBTQIA+ community, older adults, mandated clients, women, men, children, ethnic minorities, etc.
·         Others topics you may desire to select (please discuss these with the instructor prior to doing this assignment).
 
After thoroughly defining and describing the practice aspect you select, examine the roots of your perceived difficulty. Theories and required readings discussed in the current or previous classes should be applied to the assessment.
Next, incorporate discussion on the NASW Code of Ethics, specifically the core values of social work. Which values apply to your discussion? Be specific in your application.
The final section should be a thoughtful description of the personal plan you have devised to address this perceived deficit for future practice. Please note: stating that you will simply refer a client for services elsewhere is not sufficient.
Note: You may write in the first person. It is helpful to include a personal dimension of how this problem/situation may have somehow touched your life.
Limit the body of your paper to 3-4 typewritten, double-spaced pages, using a 12-point font. You must make use of at least 2 different professional reference sources (general web pages/sites are not considered professional literature) to support your discussion, in addition to the NASW Code of Ethics. Be sure that the sources you cite are used to explore your own thoughts, ideas, and behaviors and that you are not providing information on how to treat specific individuals. Your references should be used to support your discussion about why working with this population presents an ethical dilemma for you, not to describe the population.
For example, if you anticipate that working with clients with substance use issues is an issue, cite resources that discuss topics such countertransference and boundaries. Do not include articles about the numbers of adults with substance use issues, factors that lead to substance use issues, etc.
Be sure to utilize correct APA format and proofread your writing thoroughly.